In contract analysis and contract automation, a knowledge base (KB) of legal entities is fundamental for performing tasks such as contract verification, contract generation and contract analytic. However, such a KB does not always exist nor can be produced in a short time. In this paper, we propose a clustering-based approach to automatically generate a reliable knowledge base of legal entities from given contracts without any supplemental references. The proposed method is robust to different types of errors brought by pre-processing such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Named Entity Recognition (NER), as well as editing errors such as typos. We evaluate our method on a dataset that consists of 800 real contracts with various qualities from 15 clients. Compared to the collected ground-truth data, our method is able to recall 84\% of the knowledge.

Abstract--Recently, word embedding algorithms have been applied to map the entities of recommender systems, such as users and items, to new feature spaces using textual elementcontext relations among them. Unlike many other domains, this approach has not achieved a desired performance in collaborative filtering problems, probably due to unavailability of appropriate textual data. In this paper we propose a new recommendation framework, called GEMRank that can be applied when the useritem matrix is the sole available souce of information. It uses the concept of profile co-occurrence for defining relations among entities and applies a factorization method for embedding the users and items. GEMRank then feeds the extracted representations to a neural network model to predict user-item like/dislike relations which the final recommendations are made based on. We evaluated GEMRank in an extensive set of experiments against state of the art recommendation methods. The results show that GEMRank significantly outperforms the baseline algorithms in a variety of data sets with different degrees of density. Recommendation Systems help users to find relevant items based on their preferences. Many prominent recommendation systems are using Collaborative Filtering (CF) for making recommendations ( [1]).

The satisfiability problem for monadic infinite-valued Gödel logic is known to be undecidable. We identify a fragment of this logic extended with strong negation whose satisfiability is not only decidable but it is decidable within classical logic. We use this fragment to formalize the rules of CADIAG-2, a well performing fuzzy expert system assisting in the differential diagnosis in internal medicine. A (classical) satisfiability check of the resulting formulas allowed the detection of some errors in the rules of the system.